share email twitter ⋅ join discord whatsapp(2ck)
free120  nbme24  nbme23  nbme22  nbme21  nbme20  nbme19  nbme18  nbme17  nbme16  nbme15  nbme13 
Welcome to drmantistoboggan4’s page.
Contributor score: 17


Comments ...

 +17  (nbme21#47)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

tI isda it was tlfaa to easlm in uo,ter dna eht tuseqoin kesad bouat lvie norb opgsfirnf. eSnci hte esaml tnr’ae bigen brno ni hte irtfs alcp,e I adsi 0%5 esamelf nda %0 ae.mls

hungrybox  fuck i got baited +30
jcrll  "live-born offspring" ← baited +21
sympathetikey  Same :/ +
arkmoses  smh +
niboonsh  why is it 50% females tho? +2
imgdoc  felt like an idiot after i figured out why i got this wrong. +1
temmy  oh shit! +
suckitnbme  This isn't exactly right as males can still be born as evidenced by individuals III 6,9,11. This basically an x-linked recessive disease. A carrier mother can still pass her normal X chromosome to a son (50% chance). It's just that the other 50% chance of passing an affected X chromosome results in death of the fetus in utero. Thus all males actually born will not be affected. +2
makinallkindzofgainz  @suckitnbme, Correct, but if you're a live-born male, you 100% for sure do NOT have the disease, so the chance of a live-born male "being affected" is 0. +3
spow  @suckitnbme it's not X-linked recessive, otherwise every single son would be affected and therefore have died in utero. It's X-linked dominant +2
qball  Jail-baited +




Subcomments ...