Welcome to irgunner's page.
Contributor score: 2
A bilayer has hydrophobic tails (polar head + nonpolar tails). If the N-terminus could be embedded in there, it would also have to be hydrophobic; but if an N-terminus were hydrophobic, it wouldn't dissolve well in the cytosol (=mostly water). In fact, an N-terminus probably wouldn't dissolve at all. If it were hydrophobic, it would aggregate with other, nearby N-terminuses (or other hydrophobic motifs). But if that happened, shuttle proteins couldn't recognize N-terminuses in the first place (they wouldn't be sterically accessible), nor deliver them to the rER.
thanks for this explanation!
can any one explain to me why not lens ?
@macrophage95 Lens are an interal part of the refractive power of the eye. Without the lens the image would not be formed on the retina, thus leading to visual loss
Do anyone know why not choroid?
@qfever, no choroid would also be more detrimental to vision since it supplies blood to the retina
That random zanki card with colobomas associated with a failure of the choroid fissure to close messed me up
Seems like the key to this question is in what is omitted from the question stem: there is no mention of vision loss. If we assume there is no vision loss, then we can eliminate things associated with visual acuity (weird to think of in 2 week old but whatever): C, D, E, F. Also, by @hayayah 's reasoning, we eliminate E & F. If you reconsider the "asymmetric left pupil" then the only likely answer between A & B is B, Iris because the iris' central opening forms the pupil. I mistakenly put A because I was thinking of the choroid fissure and I read the question incorrectly - but it's a poorly worded question IMO.