share email twitter ⋅ join discord whatsapp(2ck)
free120  nbme24  nbme23  nbme22  nbme21  nbme20  nbme19  nbme18  nbme17  nbme16  nbme15  nbme13 
Welcome to sunny’s page.
Contributor score: 4


Comments ...


 +1  (nbme18#18)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

hwy is stih os i// onkw sit icasb but i??..llst.

krewfoo99  I think its neutrophils because they mention myelosupression and rapidly dividing cells. +2
wishmewell  Ya, Neutrophils, basophils, macrophages, eosinophils are considered Myeloid cells. While the rest of the T cells are from the Lymphoid lineage, The Immunoglobulins come from B cells ( lymphoid lineage). +6
cuthbertallg0od  Myelosuppression refers to bone marrow suppression as a whole, including lymphocytes. I got it wrong too and no clue why its neutrophils, but I don't think that's why +
cuthbertallg0od  Maybe they're looking for us to pick "losing innate immunity" (maybe worse than losing adaptive?), which wouldn't refer to complement here since the problem isn't in the liver +
scrambledeggs  FA2020 p.424 Neutropenia: Absolute neutrophil count < 1500 cells/mm3. Severe infections typical when < 500 cells/mm3. Causes: Sepsis/postinfection, drugs (including chemotherapy), aplastic anemia, SLE, radiation +1
kmichaels  Pretty sure the idea is that it's just the fact that you classical follow neutrophils. All cytotoxic T-cell activity is talking about ACTIVITY not counts. NK cells we just don't really measure those I think haha +1

 -6  (nbme22#49)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

FA pg 580 19() mtpp seausc .......a.....p...........r.....n.............s.k......i..

mkreamy  ...... +4

 +4  (nbme22#34)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

ywh is hist nto a cssro laeticsno yr?vues ... scnie we ear ignsak ta a rculiatrap mtei

drdoom  As Aristotle once quipped, “A ‘single-point in time’ doth not a cross-sectional study make.” The design of a cross-sectional study would not define “ahead of time” two cohorts (two groups); said another way, a cross-sectional design would not “split people into two groups.” In the design of a cross-sectional study there is only “one group”, and then you ask all members of that group some question (“Do you have asthma?”). At the end of a cross-sectional study, the authors will be able to make a statement like this: “We called 10,000 phone numbers with area code 415 at random and asked ‘Do you take Drug X?’ 500 responded ‘I don’t know’, 633 responded ‘Yes’, and 8,867 responded ’No’.” +16
castlblack  That is interesting. I think the question is phrased ambiguously. I interpreted the question stem to say that they called random people and sorted them into hemorrhagic stroke pts vs controls after the fact using an ORAL questionnaire. Therefore the question would be " Did you have a stroke?" Yes = 702 or no = 1376. And thus would be a cross-sectional study. I see now that the questionnaire must be paper and contacted from some unstated list of drug X recipients. +

 +0  (nbme22#10)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

HWY OTN YEdnS,a nhet rhsea the eomny with eht epyniat so he sodn'te btuod uroy stimveo.

ergogenic22  because then it is as if you are paying the patient to enroll in the experimental treatment +
ergogenic22  because then it is as if you are paying the patient to enroll in the experimental treatment, which I don't know why that would be wrong +
dubywow  Bribery is only good for doctors. Can't bribe patients. That's illegal. Kind of like how NCAA gets paid a lot, but student athletes get nadda. Still the TLDR is it always ethical to disclose financial incentives when they relate to anything that may affect your decision on how to treat a patient. +2




Subcomments ...

submitted by medpsychosis(110),
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

heT wya I thuthog obatu it was a eittll rmeo s.cislipitm We esu non eeecvtlis etab esclobkr ..(ge aplonPl)roor ofr eht mteanttre of esnisltae .tomerr hTeferero a ebat nsogiat ldouw eavh hte pitoesop tcefe,f aak csuae ro nhaeecn m.orter

hungrybox  Genius +3  
sunny  Also it(blockers) hides signs of hypoglycemia which are tremors. +3  


unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

odluw oayenn eb laeb ot ciyfarl awht teh sohret louwd )?bAe Aeergnll emeddati csitnvirsotcnooa, eaidlgn ot csmihice tiesus nuir:yj Tepy BI) idiBnng of aegntin ot gEI no teh srceuaf fo amts lslec ldnaieg to msat lelc ureiadn:tgnola Tyep C) I isdtpieoon fo bndaotianyitgen- solemcpex thiwin tpoilrsaalcyp eeun,vsl lngaied ot acianvtoti of lcem:nemotp toN D)rues iychPooatssg fo negatni yb soterunihp,l nligead to itoadxn etiedadm esusti aed:agm eypT ?III

sunny  i think C is type III +2  
sunny  i think C is type III +  
dentist  In Type III HS, First C happens then then D happens +  


unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

wlduo oaynen be blae to fclrayi htwa eth htsore oludw eAb?) Algleenr dadimete ooicnnvo,astrscit dgelnia ot ihicmesc uisste iyu:jrn yepT B)I inBdgin fo ninateg to EgI on eth efaurcs fo tmsa clsel edgilna ot mast elcl die:nnaagurtol Tepy )IC endospoiti of geiodytaabnnt-in expslmoec nwhiti irolaaylppcts unveel,s iaeldng to ntoativaci of pnce:emlomt tNo s D)rue ysoihcgPtaos of aetingn yb plhire,utnos agnedil ot onxtadi middteea suetsi m:aeagd Teyp III?

sunny  i think C is type III +2  
sunny  i think C is type III +  
dentist  In Type III HS, First C happens then then D happens +