emapoiredL: gntAosi at ipoudoi- rtsceeopr. lSsow utg titlomyi m(emre,erb aitpnsootcin si a oommcn dsie cetffe rof lal od)ip.iso
:Q Wloud a nkijeu atwn ot sue odeapeLm?ir
A: o,N ti hsa poro SCN apoeneitntr c(hwih is yhw it ahs a low ddviatiec t.oieap)nlt
Q: odluW a knijeu rheart ehva poheirmn or benrpphire?uon
A: oMrhnp.ie Boht ear ioudoi-p tis,gonas btu rinmheop si a lful iaostng hielw hrruipopenneb is yonl a arplait .aognsti
:Q hWat otbau irnehpom sv. dneeico?
A: icrkT ,uiqsonte obth rea ptilara ti.snsoag
Do not read ahead if you have not taken NBME 22!!!
I'm smh at this question because in NBME 22, they describe a scenario in which loperamide caused CNS effects - particularly ventilatory depression and we were supposed to know that it was loperamide. I guess this question specified "little to no" rather than "none at all" but come ON, I'm annoyed that we have to separate such nitpicky detail when one question emphasizes its lack of CNS effects, then they turn around and test us on an exception of this exact same content. /end rant
This was not very informative at all, I just wanted to consolidate a similar question that I knew I had just seen but it turned into me just being angry I'm sorry.