need help with your account or subscription? click here to email us (or see the contact page)
join telegramNEW! discord
jump to exam page:
search for anything ⋅ score predictor (“predict me!”)

Retired NBME 20 Answers

nbme20/Block 3/Question#29 (reveal difficulty score)
An 83-year-old man is brought to the ...
Early septic shock 🔍 / 📺 / 🌳 / 📖
tags:

 Login (or register) to see more


 +7  upvote downvote
submitted by hayayah(1212)
get full access to all contentpick a username

Septic shock is a type of distributive shock which is marked by massive vasodilation (d/t inflammatory response) causing decreased SVR, decreased preload / PCWP, and increased CO.

get full access to all contentpick a username
smc213  Septic shock can also present with hypothermia <36C +3
bethune  Why is it not gastrointestinal bleeding? +4
beanie368  GI bleeding would present with increased SVR as a response to hypovolemia +10
mysteriousmantyping  Why would this not be pulmonary embolism? +1
step1passfail  Pulmonary embolism would cause a decrease in cardiac output. There is increased pressure in the high compliant RV which can bulge and compress the LV, decreasing its preload. CO=Heart rate x stroke volume and stroke volume is partially determined by preload. If the pulmonary embolism is large enough, it can also obstruct the pulmonary vessels and subsequently not have enough blood going to the LA and LV, ultimately making the cardiac output near 0. +3
chj7  Out of all the different types of shock, cardiac output is increased only in distributive shock (ie. anaphylactic, septic). +1



 +1  upvote downvote
submitted by bfinard1(3)
get full access to all contentpick a username

Can someone explain why cardiac output is high in septic shock?

get full access to all contentpick a username
drdoom  Bacteria and bacterial components (like LPS) in circulation trigger massive release of cytokines (Interleukin-1, Interleukin-6 and TNFa), resulting vasodilation. Heart rate increases to maintain decent BP. +1
bfinard1  Is stroke volume not affected by that massive vasodilation? I would think if venous system is vasodilated then you'd have reduced EDV from reduced blood flow to heart +
zedora  Both of you are correct. In septic shock there is a massive vasodilation. In order to compensate for the reduced blood pressure, there is an increased heart rate. Now, keeping this in mind, what is the CO formula? CO = HR x SV Right? Lets say under normal conditions HR is 60 & Stroke volume is 50. Your cardiac output = 60 x 50 = 3000. Now in septic shock, your heart rate is massivly increased but your stroke volume is decreased minimally. So lets plug in the numbers. Lets say, under septic shock, HR = 150 & stroke volume is now 30. The cardiac output is now gonna be = 150 x 30 = 4500, hence your CO is increased. In Septic Shock, the heart rate is massively increased compared to the amount of SV decreased. +
drdoom  @bfinard1 By vasodilation, I almost exclusively mean arterial vasodilation. When it comes to CV, I always work backward from “first principles”, and in my view the first principle of the CV system is, “Maintain pressures to maintain good flow.” All other accommodations of the CV system (changes in inotropy[strength], chronotropy[time], vasoconstriction and vasodilation) are in *service* to maintaining flows. Without good flows, you get the thing human tissues like the least: not lack of oxygen but accumulation of CO2 (and the acidity that goes with it). +
drdoom  So, all that was a long-winded way of saying that Cardiac Output will remain high when the body is producing higher-than-desired levels of CO2 (when organs and the immune system have gone into overdrive to respond to a threat or to address decompensation in some other part of the system); the plummeting of Cardiac Output heralds the beginning of the end. It signifies that the stresses being imposed on the body exceed the capabilities of the system. +



 +0  upvote downvote
submitted by calvin_and_hobbes(2)
get full access to all contentpick a username

Why is the T normal in this patient? I would have predicted underlying infection — ie, fever — before even "early" septic shock. I selected septic shock purely for the intractable low SVR despite fluids but want to understand more about the absence of fever... Thanks!

get full access to all contentpick a username
drdoom  Elderly (and immunocompromised, generally) do not mount robust fever responses to bacteria and other microorganisms; in elderly, this probably has to do with “declines” of the innate immune system (your macrophages, dendritic cells, monocytes, &c., just don't function as well as they used to). In other words, if you (1) wiped out someone's immune system and then (2) injected bacteria into their bloodstream, you wouldn't observe any fever either. The presence of a “typical” (normal) fever in an elderly or immunocompromised patient can be a super concerning sign: they might have a raging infection on the inside. +
drdoom  ^from the article: “Absent or blunted fever response in the elderly. There is ample evidence that a blunted fever response to a serious bacterial, viral, or fungal infection suggests a poorer prognosis than does a robust fever response [13]. In addition, there is a substantial body of data, mostly from animal models, that fever—through its effects on immune function—may be an important host defense mechanism [14]. Roughly 20%–30% of elderly persons with serious bacterial or viral infections will present with a blunted or entirely absent fever response [2,3,15].” +



 -2  upvote downvote
submitted by spaceboy98(22)
get full access to all contentpick a username

The way i look at this is the temperature.

A hypothermic patient will almost always present with septic shock because septic shock can present as both hyperthermia or hypothermia

get full access to all contentpick a username
athenathefirst  Doesn't sound accurate. This patient had a normal temperature. +



Must-See Comments from nbme20

amorah on Cytomegalovirus infection
masonkingcobra on Contact with parakeets
hayayah on Capillary hydrostatic: increased; ...
hayayah on X chromosome-linked isoenzymes
medbitch94 on Mannose 6-phosphate
hello on Capillary hydrostatic: increased; ...
hayayah on Osteoblasts
imgdoc on Hypophosphatemia
hayayah on Missense
celeste on 50%
justgettinby on Omeprazole
andrewk1 on Cold, dry air
yotsubato on Jugular venous pressure of 12 mm Hg
strugglebus on Drug effect

search for anything NEW!