need help with your account or subscription? click here to email us (or see the contact page)
join telegramNEW! discord
jump to exam page:
search for anything ⋅ score predictor (โ€œpredict me!โ€)

NBME 16 Answers

nbme16/Block 1/Question#17 (reveal difficulty score)
A 67-year-old woman comes to the physician ...
Low sensitivity ๐Ÿ” / ๐Ÿ“บ / ๐ŸŒณ / ๐Ÿ“–
tags:

 Login (or register) to see more


 +3  upvote downvote
submitted by โˆ—cassdawg(1780)
get full access to all contentpick a username

Occult blood testing of the stool has a notoriously low sensitivity for picking up cancer (i.e. it has a very high rate of false negatives), and thus in this individual with an increased risk of colorectal cancer based on family history you would not want to use occult blood test for fear of a false negative result (where the test was negative but the individual actually had cancer).

"It exhibited a sensitivity of 12.9%-79.4% with a specificity of 86.7%-97.7% for CRC screening in many studies."

FA2020 p388 lists screening guidelines for colorectal cancer.

In this individual with what would be considered a higher pretest probability, the test would be known to have a higher positive predictive value and a lower negative predictive value. It is not uncertainty surrounding these that would affect the decision (FA2020 p257)

get full access to all contentpick a username



Must-See Comments from nbme16

zincy7 on Gastrin
bingcentipede on Cerebral edema
cassdawg on Kidney
medninja on Lysosomes
cassdawg on Sildenafil
cassdawg on Feces-contaminated soil
cassdawg on Peutz-Jeghers
cassdawg on Presence of an internal ribosome entry site
hungrybox on Induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes that ...
andro on Antagonizes VLDL-cholesterol secretion
bingcentipede on Decreased function of Na+โ€“K+ ATPase
bingcentipede on Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
cassdawg on 46,XXY
bingcentipede on Grade 4/6, holosystolic murmur heard best ...

search for anything NEW!