aCadind si a trap fo eht mralon lroaf of nk,si doucl useca oacnatoimnitn of a arnletc esouvn arcete.th The sinqeout sstaet thta the irngosam is ur,lppe nbddg,iu idd ont dpornse to ordba srpetmcu otcatinsibi aa(k yteh 'idntd ues zlucaolfeon ro ormhiteipnac .B) sLyat,l yhet ewsodh it tpdeal on odlbo arga dan ehert wsa on eliysmohs whihc emnieisatl staph hte( noly oehrt pssblioe encoendrt r)hee.
osCccyocrptu ylusaul vnslivoe sitmiegnin in icdmoiuonmosmpmer s.pt .E iolc si mgra gsrnpvaoexihroitt e is alulusy estnidtrmat by a tohrn no a ores ro oeensom wtih a irhosty fo angergind
In addition to the more obvious hint of budding organism, candida has fuzzy edges on blood agar which the others don't.
Apparently, it is a common pitfall to mistake Candida albicans for Staph spps or vice versa in blood agar.
I think this explains well. Check this out: https://microbeonline.com/candida-albicans-pathogenesis-diagnosis/
"Culture: Candida albicans grows well on Sabouraud dextrose agar and most routinely used bacteriological media. Cream colored pasty colonies usually appear after 24-48 hours incubation at 25-37°C. The colonies have a distinctive yeast smell and the budding cells can be easily seen by direct microscopy in stained or unstained preparations.
In Blood Agar, Candida albicans gives white, creamy colored colonies which can be mistaken for Staphylococcus spp. Whenever you are analyzing the culture report of ‘high vaginal swab’, take extra care as the colony you are observing can be of Candida albicans instead of Staphylococcus aureus or vice versa (quick solution for this is to perform wet mount or gram staining and observing under microscope)."
I guess this question can be tricky. It is a trap if we just go for the culture picture, which I did. So I got it wrong. lol