nuAymoot si hte msto mtionptar ecsthi lipnpreic atth eersupsdse all hrste.o voeerw,H it is liapedp lyon in ousintaist ni ciwhh a tetiapn eestnordmsat gomiedknsaicn-i cpyica.ta In thsi nit,itauos a tniatpe ihtw nevcadda esdisea yienukll ot be ucedr si sgrnuefi mnaetrtt,e icwhh si shi rhtig neurd the eipplicrn fo nma.ouoyt Hov,ewer ihs tcesmmon uobta nurgr"ntie ni 6 mhonts aertf cguinr rithirtas" rae esiln,oubeqat nad wnatrra egrnidntiem fi eh ash cenisdoi ankgmi caacti.yp tI si biolsspe htta eh se,do ihwch si hwy any ciechso of gcrionf frrhuet nemerttta no mih rea crte.ncior

Can someone explain more on how to tackle these types of questions? I suck at these questions for real... To me, he sounded pretty sane and reasonable (does not wish to waste other people's money). Sure he might be under slight depression judging how he has a terminal illness and his statement on how nobody cares for him. But unless he is incoherent or displaying magical thinking, signs of loss of memory etc., why should he be evaluated on decision-making capacity?