Why can't it be choice E? I assumed the patient had bipolar.
Can someone explain more on how to tackle these types of questions? I suck at these questions for real... To me, he sounded pretty sane and reasonable (does not wish to waste other people's money). Sure he might be under slight depression judging how he has a terminal illness and his statement on how nobody cares for him. But unless he is incoherent or displaying magical thinking, signs of loss of memory etc., why should he be evaluated on decision-making capacity?
submitted by โm-ice(370)
Autonomy is the most important ethics principle that supersedes all others. However, it is applied only in situations in which a patient demonstrates decision-making capacity. In this situation, a patient with advanced disease unlikely to be cured is refusing treatment, which is his right under the principle of autonomy. However, his comments about "returning in 6 months after curing arthritis" are questionable, and warrant determining if he has decision making capacity. It is possible that he does, which is why any choices of forcing further treatment on him are incorrect.