Normally the arachnoid villi drains the CSF from the subarachnoid space to the venous system; if this part becomes defective then you can imagine all that CSF now building up in the subarachnoid space.
The patient has a leaking berry aneurysm --> this leads to a subarachnoid hemorrhage (or leakage into subarachnoid space) --> acute SAH can lead to decreased absorption and movement via arachnoid villi
simply the blood inside the CSF become blocked through arachnoid granulations ==> decrease absorption of CSF==>communicating hydrocephalus.
Why would decreased movement through the cerebreal aquaduct be wrong? With all the build of blood in the CSF tract without absorption, wouldnt movement also be decreased through the aqueduct?
could it also be possible to get this by remembering the different ventricle spaces as well. i honestly didnt remember what hydrocephalus this could be. But i remembered the mnemontic LIT AFF to SAD.(Lateral ventrical, intraventricular foramina of monroe, third ventrical, cerebral aqueduct, fourth ventricle, foramina of lushka, subarachannoid, arachanoid granulations, dural venous sinus). And i recognized they were talking about a widing of subarachanoid space and thought what was the closest thing to interefere and thats how i got to B.
Also i just want to say looking at the answers i know its a communicating hydrocephalus, i just wanna know if this was also a good way to extract the answer or if i just winded up getting lucky a little LOL.
submitted by โhappysingh(57)
so, the Key words that no one is mentioning : communicating hydrocephalus
the pathophys goes like this :
an inflammatory setting (i.e., subarachnoid hemorrhage) yield fibrosis / scarring of the arachnoid granulations => impaired CSF drainage
the key points / concepts they are trying to test here : 1. do you know what communicating hydrocephalus (without them telling you those words) 2. do you know what's the pathophysiology (of communicating hydrocephalus) is ?