need help with your account or subscription? click here to email us (or see the contact page)
join telegramNEW! discord
jump to exam page:
search for anything ⋅ score predictor (โ€œpredict me!โ€)

NBME 24 Answers

nbme24/Block 2/Question#5 (reveal difficulty score)
A 55-year-old man is diagnosed with coronary ...
Decreased adherence ๐Ÿ” / ๐Ÿ“บ / ๐ŸŒณ / ๐Ÿ“–
tags:

 Login (or register) to see more


 +63  upvote downvote
submitted by โˆ—lamhtu(139)
get full access to all contentpick a username

Platelet adherence and platelet aggregation are different things and this diferrence MATTERS A LOT. Fuck you, NBME. These differences supposedly matter on some questions and not on others. Where is the consistency? Hello?

get full access to all contentpick a username
hungrybox  Agreed. This is so fucking stupid. +
hungrybox  "Aspirin inhibits platelet aggregation and produces a mild bleeding defect by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, a platelet enzyme that is required for TXA2 synthesis." literally straight from Big Robbins +1
susyars  Im gonna upvote this bc i love to be right +7
regularstudent  It's always a horrible, horrible feeling to pick the wrong answer that you know they think is right. Amazing job NBME... +5
j44n  yeah i thought adherence was the GP1B receptor that's already on the platelet +1
j44n  im also glad we're getting exposed to this horse shit now and now when I'm in a testing center about to put my fist through a screen. +2
jurrutia  GPiib/iiia receptor is not inhibited by aspirin. Aspirin prevents the upregulation of GPiib/iiia which is not the same as inhibiting the receptor itself. +2
jj375  @jurrutia I think you are thinking of Clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticlopidine which downregulate GP2b3a expression. Aspirin inhibits COX therefore inhibiting TXA2 and platelet aggregation. +
jbrito718  This is whaat I call a FUCKBOY question +



 +4  upvote downvote
submitted by โˆ—susyars(41)
get full access to all contentpick a username

Im gonna fight this one because AGGREGATION is mediated by expression of Gp IIb/IIIa.

If your platelet increases TXA2 that means is gonna upregulate AGGREGATION by which receptor? ... Duh

Once Im done with this test and become a Pathologist Im gonna send you a copy of my journal and research on platelet aggregation mediated by TXA2 and Gp IIb/IIIa and also im gonna go over every single WTF NBME question and prove them so wrong

Maybe i should change my username before submitting this

get full access to all contentpick a username
corgilobacter  Dr. Tio Goljan Jr. In the house everyone. CLAPS +
susyars  Tio Goljan would be so proud of me +
j44n  I agree TXA2 up-regulates the GP2b3A receptor that mediates aggregation. +



 +2  upvote downvote
submitted by โˆ—thisshouldbefree(51)
get full access to all contentpick a username

TXA2 doesnt seem to mediate induction of GP2b/3a. fa19/pg403 - ADP binding to P2Y12R induces Gp2b/3a expression at surface. ADP is released from plts. One must think about the down stream functions. If TXA2 helps aggregation via decreasing blood flow. if we therefore dont decrease blood flow we cant get the plts to later adhere properly.

get full access to all contentpick a username



 +1  upvote downvote
submitted by xw1984(8)
get full access to all contentpick a username

English is not my first language, but would it be possible that adherence is not equivalent to adhesion and somehow interchangeable to aggregation? I feel like doing a reading comprehension test, not USMLE.

get full access to all contentpick a username



 +1  upvote downvote
submitted by step1forthewin(2)
get full access to all contentpick a username

Can someone please clarify the answer. Is decreased adherence same as decreased aggregation? Wouldn;t inhibition of the IIb/IIIa receptor prevent aggregation?

get full access to all contentpick a username
xxabi  I'm not completely sure...but I think its because its aspirin, and aspirin doesn't work on IIb/IIIa receptors. That's why i picked decreased adherence of platelets, figured that was the closest thing to decreased aggregation that still made sense with aspirin's mechanism of action. Hope that helps! +2
ihavenolife  Aspirin irreversibly inhibits COX which leads to decreased TXA2. TXA2 normally is a vasoconstrictor and induces platelet aggregation, so aspirin inhibits platelet aggregation by downplaying TXA2 not by interacting with IIb/IIIa receptor. (Source FA and UWorld) +22
fallenistand  In this case, inhibition of COX-1 by aspirin will also reduce the amount of precursors for vascular prostacyclin synthesis, provided, for example, from adhering platelets https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9263351 +1
niboonsh  inhibition of IIb/IIIa receptor is the moa of a completely separate class of drugs - Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (abciximab, eptifabide, tirofiban) +1
t123  Bad question - TXA2 upregulates GpIIb/IIIa on platelets. So aspirin inhibits their expression. +1



 +0  upvote downvote
submitted by โˆ—madamestep(17)
get full access to all contentpick a username

So thromboxane A2 has two roles: Promote aggregation (from granule release) and cause vasoconstriction.

I'm thinking we'd see decreased adherence because you're inhibiting vasoconstriction and platelets would be less likely to adhere to vWF. The increased aggregation seen with TXA2 is due to the granule release, which then goes on to activate the platelets. So while you technically do decrease the activity of the GP2b3a receptors, it's from a decreased release of ADP and not from a direct inhibitor of the receptors.

https://tmedweb.tulane.edu/pharmwiki/lib/exe/detail.php/cox2cv.png?id=introduction_to_eicosanoids

get full access to all contentpick a username



 -1  upvote downvote
submitted by โˆ—tiredofstudying(71)
get full access to all contentpick a username

Inhibition of GpIIb/IIIa receptors would be the mechanism of either (FA 2020 411):

Clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticlopidine via inhibition of ADP-induction of GpIIb/IIIa by blocking P2Y12

or

Abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban by direct GpIIb/IIIa inhibition.

A lot of questions will have very similar answer choices on the real exam, but there will always be one best answer, and decreased platelet adherence was the better answer here. As stated on many other question threads, there are plenty of tricky questions to be upset about, but this was not one of them.

get full access to all contentpick a username
woodmeister  That's not what's upsetting. What's upsetting is that there is NO correct answer available. You have to put yourself into the head of whatever twit wrote this question and try to guess how much they care about the fact that aggregation (GPIIB/IIIA + TXA2 mediated) and adherence (GPIB mediated) are not the same thing. +1



Must-See Comments from nbme24

seagull on Intestinal mucosa
tissue creep on Ask the roommate not to smoke in the apartment
drdoom on Adenosine
seagull on Increased serum testosterone concentration
atstillisafraud on Lamins
niboonsh on Only cookies are independently associated ...
atstillisafraud on Scar formation
lamhtu on Decreased adherence
drachenx on Damage to the rectovaginal septum
drdoom on Intestinal mucosa
azibird on Coronavirus
lsmarshall on Organic acid metabolism disorder
sympathetikey on Inhalant abuse
tea-cats-biscuits on Eosinophils

search for anything NEW!